The Epic Of Beowulf By Joseph Campbell - 1038 Words

Joseph Campbell, a philosopher from the 1980’s, once said â€Å"She sits there. She is now a woman. And what is a woman? A woman is a vehicle for life. Life has overtaken her. Woman is what it is all about – the giving of birth and the giving of nourishment. She is identical with the earth goddess in her powers, and she has got to realize this about herself. The boy does not have a happening of this kind, so he has to be turned into a man and voluntarily become a servant of something greater than himself.† This quotation directly relates to the idea that old English epics were not written about women due to the fact that women did not need to go on a journey to find their womanhood. This thought by Joseph Campbell is somewhat true in the†¦show more content†¦She does not want her husband to give up the throne to Beowulf, but instead to give it to her nephew who can hold the throne until her son can rule. Queen Wealhtheow in these two occasions shows the expected roles of women in a epic as well as the non-expected behavior of a woman during this period. Another woman in Beowulf is Hildeburh, she exemplifies basic women’s roles during this time by being married off as a peace offering, as well as defying them by standing up saying that her son is her own and not to be associated with her husband. Hildeburh was originallty married off to keep the Danes and Jutes from fighting but those efforts were not able to stop the fighting as explained in the story of Hildeburh: â₠¬Å"Nor had hildeburh cause to acclaim the faith of the Jutish fold, Blameless, bereft of her brothers in battle, and stripped of her sons Who fell overcome by their fate and wounded with spears† (lines1074-1076). Although this outcome is tragic, her marriage and childbirth show that women in epics are supposed to give life and not be a hero. However Hildebruh defies the normal gender stereotypes by standing up to the men who want to bury her son. They wish to bury her son inShow MoreRelatedHeroes and How to Represent Them929 Words   |  4 Pagescombination of qualities. There are two types of heroes in literature, tragic and epic. A tragic hero makes some sort of statement about the nature of man. Tragic heroes show the downfall of a prominent and powerful hero. He should also bring pity and fear on part of the audience but also be admirable and good. The hero’s death must come as a result of some personal error or decision. As opposed to the epic hero, an epic hero has physical might, and is more skillful than any other man. They are bolderRead MoreComparing The Epics And The Epic Heroes2376 Words   |  10 PagesComparison of the Epics In every epic, there are common themes that present themselves throughout the story, such as war. The epics Gilgamesh, Beowulf, and The Mahabharata, share similar characteristics in terms of their strength, values, and journeys. In each of the epics that will be discussed, there is the occurrence of fighting for honor and to have a legacy. The epic heroes follow many of the guidelines that Joseph Campbell has written in his book Hero with a Thousand Faces. Joseph Campbell believedRead MoreGood vs. Evil in Beowulf1456 Words   |  6 PagesGood vs. Evil in Beowulf Beowulf is longest and greatest early Anglo-Saxon poem which was composed in England sometime in the eighth century AD by a literate scop. This poem was created in the oral poetic tradition. This poem is considered as an epic because it is a long narrative poem which composed in an elevated style, dealing with the glories of hero (Tolkien 24). The setting of this epic is the six century in Denmark and southern Sweden. The protagonist, Beowulf is a noble warrior representsRead MoreThree Elements Of The Heros Journey In Beowulf994 Words   |  4 Pageshero’s journey, a system coined by Joseph Campbell. Elements of the hero’s journey can be found in every single story, from Harry Potter to Paradise Lost. The hero’s journey is in every story, and especially in the epic poem Beowulf. Beowulf has all the trappings of a memorable story. There are beasts, and a shining hero, as well as honor and loyalty. Beowulf also follows the Hero’s journey, if not distinctly . The epic poem Beowulf holds many similarities to Joseph Campbell’s monomyth, three of theseRead MoreBeowulf As A Heros Journey1624 Words   |  7 PagesFor Beowulf to retain its relevance after a journey from single surviving manuscript to famous epic poem, one can assume its star role is filled by a character extraordinary. The poem’s hero, Beowulf, strikingly resembles many renown principal characters. It would be an uphill battle arguing against him joining the likes of Hercules, Jesus Christ, and many more in their ÃÅ"bermensch status. Based on his words and actions, it is painstakingly clear that Beowulf is an archetypal hero; someone who sharesRead MoreEssay on Beowulf and the Heros Journey1073 Words   |  5 PagesJoseph Campbell’s term monomyth can be described as a hero’s journey. Many heroic characters follow the monomyth, no matter the time period or culture the literature was created in. The poem Beowulf is known to follow the adventure of the hero described in Campbell’s monomyth . The hero’s journey consists of three rites of passages: separation, initiation, and return. Beowulf endures each of these stages throughout the epic poem, so his journey does follow Campbell’s monomyth. The separationRead MoreComparing Beowulf And Sir Gawain And The Green Knight Essay1555 Words   |  7 PagesMiddle Ages, Beowulf and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, both reflect attributes of loyalty, specifically the testing of one’s loyalty and the consequences of disloyalty, which reflect the behavior and values shared by the Anglo-Saxons and the people of the Late Medieval era. When analyzing loyalty in both of these works one will see that one’s own self-worth turns loyalty into selfishness to save oneself rather than risking one’s life for the sake of the community. Joseph Campbell outlined archetypesRead MoreHeroes : The Green Knight And Oedipus1156 Words   |  5 Pageshero is seen as a selfless and courageous individual who saves the day. Joseph Campbell, an American mythologist, once said â€Å"the hero is the man of self achieved submission.† A hero must also go through the twelve stages which include: call to adventure, assistance/departur e, trials, approach, crisis, treasure, result, returning to their ordinary world, new life, resolution and returning to status quo. Heroes such as Beowulf, The Green Knight and Oedipus, are all seen as heroes for different reasonsRead MoreThe Journey Of Beowulf : The Heros Journey1944 Words   |  8 Pagesguys†? A Hero’s Journey is the form Joseph Campbell created from his book The Hero With A Thousand Faces it is a more detailed transformation or inner journey of a character throughout a story. A hero in an epic which is a long, narrative poem from ancient oral telling. In the epic â€Å"Beowulf†, Beowulf is the epic hero. He performed many heroic deeds during his life including the killing of Grendel and his mother, he did what many were not willing to take on. Beowulf takes on a Hero’s Journey by havingRead MoreWhat Would Beowulf Do? How Beowulf Is a Christ-Like Figure Essay1642 Words   |  7 Pagesclearly displayed in the epic poem, Beowulf, a tal e of the adventures and struggles of a mighty Geatish (Swedish) warrior, Beowulf, against a sinister afflicter of men, a vicious revenge seeking mother, and a fire breathing twilight-spoiler. The author of one of the most important works of Anglo-Saxon literature is unknown; however, it is believed that the heroic poem was finally translated by monks, which may account for the reason that according to the narrative, Beowulf is seen as an instrument

The Differences Between The North And The South - 2070 Words

The stark differences between the North and the South surface on a myriad of occasions throughout the novel, and can incontrovertibly be argued as some of the main causes of the war. Fremantle, for example, is an Englishman who shadows Longstreet. As he tries to reason the causes of the war and how they fit into the experiment of democracy in the United States, he cogitates, â€Å"The North has those bloody cities and a thousand religions and the only aristocracy is the aristocracy of wealth. The Northerner doesn’t give a damn for tradition, or breeding, or the Old Country. He hates the Old Country†¦. In the South†¦by and large, they were all the same nationality, same religion, same customs.† (121). In stating that the war is in fact actually about all of these differences, he contemplates the sentiment of the South, comparing it to the willingness Americans had once had to leave Europe, contrasting it with the rising changes of the North. However, the change s and disunity that Englishman Freemantle observed were not the only reasons for the tension between the two areas. Each geographic region had vastly different economic regions. Being that the North (Union) was about twice in size of the South (Confederacy), size and population resulted in mottled economical structure. The Union’s diverse economy was comprised of factories and manufacturing bases, while the Confederates maintained their flourishing cotton agriculture. Because of this, arms for the war were predominantlyShow MoreRelatedThe Differences Between The North And South1199 Words   |  5 Pagesagreements made between the founding fathers. Since the early days of the Union, compromises have been the solution to various disputes in the young nation. However as the time in the 1800s progressed, the increasing sectionalism primarily caused by slavery was leading to large amounts of tension. In the past, these disputes were settled by compromises. However, the usual co mpromise was not applicable in the mid-1800s due to the political differences between the North and South as well as the differentRead MoreDifferences Between the North and South1016 Words   |  5 PagesDBQ For many years the North and the South tried to live in harmony even though they had opposing views. The North was slowly growing a strong hate for slavery while the South strongly depended on it. So for years they try to avoided confrontation, but the question of slavery still threatened to divide them. You see this in the Missouri Compromise – Maine would enter as a free state and Missouri would enter as a slave state, but in the rest of the Louisiana Territory north of 36’30 ° slavery was prohibitedRead MoreDifferences Between The North And South Of The World887 Words   |  4 Pagespolitical factors divide the North from the South. To name a few: there is a missing year of life expectancy north of the line, children south of the line are much more likely to attend Russell group universities, house prices have recently soared in the South, and politically, the South tend to vote conservative, while the North vote labour. Similar geographical concerns are occurring on an international level. In my opinion, this divide between the North and South of the world is being exacerbatedRead MoreThe Great Sectional Differences Between North And South997 Words   |  4 Pagesand to intermarry with whites. (Mintz, S., McNeil, 2016) The Civil War in the United States was inevitable. The great sectional differences between North and South were far too great, and the main reason for these differences was the fact that slavery underlay both the southern economy and society. No one, not even Abraham Lincoln could dispute the growing gap between the nation at that time. Slavery in the United states proved too difficult to progress, mostly economically. In the 1860 electionRead MoreThe Major Differences Between the North and South Essay581 Words   |  3 Pages1. Economic and social differences between the North and the South. With Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, cotton became very profitable. This machine was able to reduce the time it took to separate seeds from the cotton. However, at the same time the increase in the number of plantations willing to move from other crops to cotton meant the greater need for a large amount of cheap labor, i.e. slaves. Thus, the southern economy became a one crop economy, depending on cotton andRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Between The North And The South During Antebellum1120 Words   |  5 PagesProf Nicolax Cox 12-08-2014 Similarities and Differences between the North and the South during Antebellum The Antebellum period in the United States history was considered as time between 1820 and 1862. During this period, significant changes took place in terms of political, social and economic effects in America. The United States economy was changed from an underdeveloped country of frontiersmen and farmers into an industrialized economy. The South American depended on agriculture while the NorthernRead MoreCultural Differences Between Modern Day North And South1334 Words   |  6 Pagesunderstand the different cultures between the north and south, not to believe in stereotypes, and made me adaptable. I can’t even begin to explain the massive cultural differences between modern-day north and south. Most people assume only climate and slang are the major difference in the two, however they could not be more wrong. Especially between Toronto and Wichita Falls, Texas. It may sound obvious but there are geographical differences. For one, in the north we have more clear and fast riversRead MoreThe Differences between the North and South on the Eve of the Civil War656 Words   |  3 PagesThe Differences between the North and South on the Eve of the Civil War On the eve of the Civil war, both the North and the South had differences, both minor and large. The main difference was Slavery where both sides had a completely dissimilar view point on how the treat black people an example of this is the Missouri compromise in 1820. There were also differences in the rate of industrialisation and Education. The largest difference between the NorthRead MoreCultural Differences Between Modern Day North And South1240 Words   |  5 Pagesto understand the different culture between the north and south, not to believe in stereotypes, and made me adaptable. I can’t even begin to explain the massive cultural differences between modern-day North and South. Most people assume only climate and slang are the major difference in the two, however they could not be more wrong. Especially between Toronto and Wichita Falls, Texas. It may sound obvious but there is geographical difference. For one in the North we have more clear and fast riversRead MoreThe Difference Between the Global North and South in Terms of Economic Prosperity2204 Words   |  9 PagesWhy has the global north developed and prospered, but the global south has not? To address the question of inequality of the Global North vs. South, one must begin at the point of origin; in which the two drastically diverged with respect to the differences in standards of living, thus creating the inequality gap we know today that separates the global north and south. It can be said that standard of living is directly related to the rate of productivity of a country (Clark, 1987). Therefore

The Final Months Of The Civil War Essay Example For Students

The Final Months Of The Civil War Essay The Final Months of the Civil WarThe Civil War was one of momentous proportion. It was disastrous in terms of human life, because more Americans died in this war that any other war in history. This paper is mainly about and around those involved on the battlefield in the final months of the civil war. It will also refer to the leading men behind the Union and Confederate forces. The war was coming to an end by January of 1865. At that time, Federal, Union, armies were spread throughout the Confederacy and the Confederate Army had greatly shrunk in size. The year before the North had suffered a huge loss of lives, but had more than enough to lose in comparison to the South. General Ulysses S. Grant became known as the ?Butcher? and many wanted him removed. (Grant, Ulysses S., Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant. New York: Charles L. Webster Co., 1894.) The war continued as Lincoln stood firm with his General. This paper will cover the events between the winter of 1864-1865 and the surrender of the Confederate States of America and will show that April 9, 1865 was indeed the end of a great tragedy. General William T. Sherman and his army cleared the civilian population of the city of Atlanta in September of 1864, then took a brief rest. It was from Atlanta that General Sherman and his army began the famous ?march to the sea?. The great march was 400 miles long and 60 miles wide. No news was heard of Sherman for 32 days. His men lived on whatever they could get from the area of the country through which they passed, as Sherman had cut himself off from his base and any supplies. Although, the army destroyed anything and everything that was in their path, they were not seen as the enemy. In view of this destruction, it is understandable that Sherman quoted, ?War is hell!? (Sherman, William T., Memoirs of General William T. Sherman. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1972.) Shermans men reached the city of Savannah on December 20, and from there Sherman telegraphed to President Lincoln: ?I beg to present you as a Christmas gift the city of Savannah, with 150 heavy guns and plenty of ammunition, and also about 25,000 bales of cotton.? (Sherman, William T., Memoirs of General William T. Sherman. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1972.)Grants decision that the only way to win and finish the war was to crunch with numbers. He knew that the federal forces held more than a modest advantage in terms of men and supplies. Grant directed Sherman to turn around and head back toward Virginia with this in mind. He immediately began making preparations to provide assistance to Sherman on the journey. General John M. Schofield and his men had just defeated the Confederates in Nashville and were to disengage from the Army of the Cumberland and then proceed toward North Carolina. His final destination was to be Goldsboro which was roughly half the distance between Savannah and Richmond. He was to meet Sherman and his troops of 50,000 there with his troop of 20,000. Sherman began moving north in mid January of 1865. The only hope of Confederate resistance would be supplied by General P. G. T. Beauregard. He was putting together an army with every means possible but was only able to assemble about 30,000 men. This would be no challenge to the combined forces of Schofield and Sherman. Shermans plan was to march through South Carolina while confusing the opponent the entire time. His men would march in two ranks. One would travel northwest to give the impression of a press against Augusta, and the other would march northeast toward Charleston. Shermans force arrived in Columbia on February 16. Great controversary arose as the city was burned to the ground. The Confederates claimed that Shermans men had set the fires ?deliberately, systematically, and atrociously?. Sherman claimed that the fires were already burning when they had arrived. Cotton bales were set on fire by the Confederate Calvary to prevent the Federal Army from getting to them and th e high winds quickly spread the fire. The controversary was short lived as no proof was ever presented. After Columbia, Charleston and Augusta had fallen, Sherman continued his move north toward Goldsboro. His progress was delayed not by the Confederate army but by the runaway slaves. The slaves joined the Union columns. They numbered in the thousands by the time they had reached North Carolina. (Barrett, John G., Shermans March through the Carolinas. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1956.) Shermans force pushed on and finally met up with Schofield in Goldsboro on March 23rd. Immediately leaving Goldsboro, Sherman was to travel to City Point to meet Grant and discuss plans of an attack. Upon arriving, not only did he find Grant, but Admiral David Porter as well. They would all wait to meet with President Lincoln. The three soldiers met with Lincoln on the morning of March 28th on the river boat ?River Queen? to discuss a strategy against General Lee and General J ohnston of the Confederate Army. Lincoln asked several times, ?Cant this last battle be avoided (Angle and Miers. Tragic Years, II.) However, both Generals expected the Rebels, Confederate Soldiers, to put up at least one more fight. All were sure of a surrender, it was to be decided how to handle the Rebels in regard to the upcoming surrender. Lincoln made his intentions very clear: ?I am full of bloodshed. You need to defeat the opposing armies and get the men composing those armies back to their homes to work on their farms and in their shops.? (Sherman, William T., Memoirs of General William T. Sherman. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1972.) The meeting lasted for a number of hours. Near the end of the meeting Lincoln made his orders clear, ?Let them once surrender and reach their homes, they wont take up arms again. They will at once be guaranteed all their rights as citizens of a common country. I want no one punished, treat them liberally all around. We want those people to return to their allegiance to the Union and submit to the laws.? (Porter, David D., Campaigning with Grant. New York: The Century Co., 1897.) The Generals and Admirals now knew what had to be done. Sherman returned to Goldsboro by steamer and Grant and Porter left by train to go back up north. Shermans course would be to continue north with Schofields men and meet Grant in Richmond. This would not happen as Lee would surrender to Grant before Sherman could ever get there. Online Shopping Vs. Market Shopping EssayThe final battle began when the Confederate battle line was formed to the west of Appomattox at daybreak. The Union soldiers were in position in front of the line with cannons. When the Federal cannons commenced to fire, the Confederate signal for attack was sounded and the troops charged. One soldier later remarked, ? It was my fortune to witness several charges during the war, but never one so magnificently executed as this one.? (McCarthy, Carlton, Detailed Minutiae of Soldier Life in the Army of Northern Virginia 1861-1865. Richmond: Carlton McCarthy, 1882.) This Confederate advance only lasted from about 7:00 am to 9:00 am, at which time the Rebels were forced back. The Confederates could no longer hold their lines and Lee sent word to Grant to meet at 1:00 pm to discuss surrender. The two men met at the now famous McLean House and a surrender was agreed upon. It was 2:00 pm on April 9, 1865. Johnstons army surrendered to General Sherma n on April 26, in North Carolina. General Taylor of Mississippi/Alabama and General Smith of the trans Mississippi/Texas surrrendered in May ending the war completely. The Civil War was a tragic event. A war in which thousands died in their home country over nothing more than a difference in opinion. Although slavery was the cause of the Civil War half of the country thought it was wrong and the other half just couldnt free them. The war was fought in probably 10,000 different places and the monetary and property loss cannot be calculated. The Union soldiers that died numbered 360,222 and only 110,000 of them died in battle. Confederate dead were estimated at 258,000 including 94,000 that actually died on the battlefield. The Civil War was a waste in terms of human lives and possible accomplishment. Tragedy had struck a new country and tarnished it for eternity. The Civil War will never be forgotten and will live on in the hearts and minds of Americans forever. BibliographyCasdorph, Paul D. Lee and Jackson Confederate Chieftains. New York: Paragon House, 1992. Catton, Bruce. A Stillness at Appomattox. New York: Doubleday, 1963. Davis, Burke. Shermans March. New York: Random House, 1980. Foote, Shelby. The Civil War. Vol 3. New York: Random House, 1974. Garraty, John Arthur. The American Nation: A History of the United States to 1877. Vol. 1, Eighth Edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers, 1995. Korn, Jerry. Pursuit to Appomattox, The Last Battles. Virginia: Time-Life Books, 1987. Leone, Bruno, ed. The Civil War Opposing Viewpoints. American History Series. California: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1995. Mathless, Paul, ed. Voices of the Civil War. Vicksburg. Virginia, Time-Life Books, 1997. Miers, Earl Schenck. The Last Campaign. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1972. BibliographyIncluded above. American History Essays